Would I read this book again in the future? Maybe, but probably not. I have generated such detest for some characters in this book that I really don't think I can go through reading it again. I also don't think I would read it again because of how painfully slow the beginning of the novel was. In comparison, I wouldn't read the third Hunger Games book, Mockingjay, again because of how SLOW it was in my opinion. So in other words, Gogol's journey in this novel is finished, and my journey reading this novel is also finished.
Let's dive head first right in to my opinions shall we? Since I was so interested in this novel, I have many opinions about the events. Prepare for a very long post!
1. Moushumi
Moushumi in a nutshell |
"The name alone, when she'd first learned it, had been enough to seduce her. Dimitri Desjardins." (Lahiri. 256)
When I continued reading about Moushumi's fantasies involving Dimitri, I finally reached page 263. I wanted to phone Gogol and warn him of the upcoming events involving his relationship the second I read this...
"She dials the number, listens as it rings four times. She wonders if he'll even remember her. Her heart races. Her finger moves to the cradle, ready to press down. "Hello?" It's his voice. "Hi, Dimitri?" "Speaking. Who's this?" She pauses. She can still hang up if she wants. "It's Mouse." They begin seeing each other [...]" (Lahiri. 263)
I have so many issues with this, so why don't I just list them off?
a) The novel says, "She can still hang up if she wants", but guess what she doesn't do? SHE DOESN'T HANG UP THE PHONE. Which means that she didn't want to hang up. She wanted to talk to this guy.
b) Doesn't she remember what a "vow" means? The literal definition of "vow" is "a solemn promise". She broke a promise, she broke morals, and in the end, she broke someone's heart. Shame on her.
c) My third issue is that on the EXACT SAME PAGE that she calls Dimitri for the first time in years (263) they are already having sex. In this novel, you can tell that this sex doesn't mean much, since Lahiri normally refers to sex as "making love". However, in this context, it is just referred to as "sex". Sex as a word has no sensual meaning, it doesn't have as much value to the act as "making love" does.
Overall, Moushumi made me want to punch a brick wall with my bare fist because of how disloyal she is to someone who is doing anything to give her everything he possibly can.
2. Fun talk about names!!!
"Moushumi argues that a name like hers is a curse, complains that no one can say it properly, that the kids at school pronounced it Moosoomi and shortened it to Moose. "I hated being the only Moushumi I knew," she says. "See now, I'd have loved that," Oliver tells her." (Lahiri. 239)
In my case, I would love to have a unique name. I think a lot of people really enjoy having a unique name, because it makes them stand out, and makes people remember them. For example, Bruno Mars's real name is Peter Hernandez. How many people with the classic name Peter do you know, versus the amount of people with the name Bruno Mars? Would you remember the name Bruno Mars easier, or Peter Hernandez easier?
Standing out for being unique |
However, at the same time I guess this could be an example of how the grass is greener on the other side of the fence. If my name wasn't Amanda, and was instead something like Lollipop, I would feel absurd and out of place. Perhaps people with unique names can tend to feel out of place, or abnormal. It all comes down to personal preference.
I also really loved how Gogol FINALLY spoke up at one of these repetitive dinner parties, and said what he was truly thinking.
"Theres no such thing as a perfect name. I think that human beings should be allowed to name themselves when they turn eighteen," he adds. "Until then, pronouns." People shake their heads dismissively." (Lahiri. 245)
YES GOGOL!!!! Tell them what you think! Who cares if they shake their heads "dismissively"? Gogol had to put up with these dinner parties for so long, listening to conversation he never cared about, and he never had input about topics. Good for you, Gogol. I can't really say I agree with what he said, because I find that naming a child is such a classic custom that takes so much thought and planning, and I find it to be a necessary part of parenthood. But to each his own.
3. An interesting connection between the narration of the novel, and Gogol's namesake.
"He had slept soundly, curled up on two seats, his book unread, using his overcoat as a blanket, pulled up to his chin." (Lahiri 280)
This made me smile, since it is obviously a connection Lahiri was making between Gogol Ganguli, and Nikolai Gogol. She could have just said that Gogol was using his coat as a blanket, but she decided to say "overcoat". Diction at it's finest! Reading this made me reminisce about the relationship Gogol and his father used to share, and think about how much Gogol misses his father. Very sad, but comforting to remember that Gogol really did care about his father.
4. I can't help but feel bad for Gogol at moments like this!
"In the spring he went to Venice alone for a week, the trip he'd planned for the two of them, saturating himself in its ancient, melancholy beauty." (Lahiri. 283)
Poor Gogol! He put so much hard work into thinking about, and planning this wonderful trip for him and Moushumi. I was ready to melt when he thought of the gift idea, for them to spend time together in Italy. That sounds so beautiful and romantic. I went to Italy about a year and a half ago, and I really think that Venice would have been a lovely place for Gogol and Moushumi to spend some quality time together. Too bad she's unfaithful!!!!
5. I also found that the writing style of the novel became much more intimate between the author and the reader after the first third of the book. It felt like the characters were right in front of me, and I was seeing them with my own eyes. The diction that Lahiri was using throughout the last 60% of the book increasingly got more interesting to me, and continued to make me want to read more.
6. Within the final 4 chapters of the novel, I really noticed that there was a recurring theme about love and marriage and how it differs from person to person in the same family.
Ashoke and Ashima had a love that branched from their pasts in India, and was most definitely a different form of love than any relationship Gogol encountered. The relationships Gogol had can be contrasted with the relationship that Ashima and Ashoke shared. Gogol had a romantic and sexual relationship with three women throughout the story (Ruth, Maxine, and Moushumi), all of which were intense relationships that really influenced the way Gogol acted. In comparison, Ashima and Ashoke were one another's only romantic partner throughout the course of the novel. Their relationship was not as sexual as the relationships Gogol possessed, and this really showed how different love can be between different people.
Love can mean something different to everyone |
This also really highlights the differences between the generations of the Ganguli family. Gogol believed that love was something he had to find on his own, and it had to make him feel something deep within himself. The love between Ashima and Ashoke was not found by them, it was arranged by their parents. In the beginning, the relationship between Ashima and Ashoke didn't make either of them feel any desire for one another deep within themselves. The idea of love in their minds was to create a family, not to be lovestruck for their partner. The idea of love in Gogol's mind was the opposite.
After reading this novel, I can conclude that the book really wasn't half bad, and I honestly did enjoy reading it. The contrasts between generations, the variety of events that occurred, and the contrasts between cultures in this novel really kept me interested in the story. Great job, Lahiri! Stay updated with my page because I intend on posting content about future novels I'm going to read!
Works Cited
Digital image. Cool Love Wallpapers Desktop. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.
Digital image. Moj Enterijer, n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.
Not Half Bad. Digital image. What's The Saying Answers. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.
Some People Be Perpetrating Like They're an Angel But Ain't Nothing But a Devil in Disguise. Digital image. Jar of Quotes. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.
Venice Is One of the Best Places to Travel to Alone, According to RoutePerfect.com. Digital image. 11 European Destinations Everyone Should Travel to Alone. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.
#Vow. Digital image. Topsy, n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2016.